Jumat, 23 Januari 2015

Learning in ARI 1



THE HISTORY OF NISHINASUNO CHURCH MOVEMENT CONCERNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITH ARI (ASIAN RURAL INSTITUTE) JAPAN
Eunike Widhi Wardhani-Indonesia
ARI

2014


The objectives of this learning are :
  1. To learn about the history of Nishinasuno Church establishment (describe the condition before establishment, what character of the foundation Christian makes the Church very different in Japan)
  2. To learn about how Nishinasuno started to bring up community development issues as part of church responsibilities and concerns.
  3. To learn about how Nishinasuno Church implemented community development activities in its congregations. What kinds of problems were prioritized and what kind of solutions were given.
  4. To learn about the closeness between Nishinasuno Church and ARI (Asian Rural Institute) that has led to sustainability terms of spiritual growth and care for the rural poor/ serving the marginalized people.

Methodology
This project have done in the form of :
  1. Making terms of reference
  2. Literature collecting,
  3. Interviewing,
  4. Analyzing,
  5. Organizing discussion material,
  6. Focus group discussion,
  7. Evaluation
  8. Writing and report

Each institution has its own history of how it was start formed. If recorded properly, the history will be passed on to future generations. 

Nishinasuno Church celebrated its 121 years birthday on September 16th 2014. This small study is not to produce a complete record of the history throughout the life of this church, but I tried to limit the background history of the Church Nishinasuno and immediately jumped on the results achieved in the realm of Community Development. The only reason why I jumped was not possible to collecting all the story because the study I completed in a matter of days or weeks. And that's just a starting point that can be developed into many topics. But I will give several recommendations that could be followed by other history enthusiasts of Nishinasuno Church and ARI.
One of my expectations came to ARI is to learn to know how the poor and farmers (including community and I accompanied my sending church) who have great potential, they should have the opportunity to develop themselves and their village. Participants who came to ARI are prepared and honed their ability as a leader to return to their village / country doing community development and community organizing is not personal but institutional. And this little church is a typical example of how a church institutions start, maintain and implement community development with strong leadership character they have.

Why I chose Nishinasuno Church?
As we know Christian people in Japan are only about 1% of population. This number is very small compared to Indonesia which are 7% of population. There are very rare big church in Japan. And compared to my church in Indonesia (GKJ Sidomukti Salatiga with the congregation of about 700 people), this Nishinasuno Church congregation is very small with few in numbers.
Many churches are doing various forms of community development. But I chose Nishinasuno because there is historical connection directly with ARI, the institution where I am now participating the rural leadership training. The concept of rural leadership that have passed through the history of this century is not likely to happen in an instant.
From there I became interest in learning more about the church's role in community development as evidenced by the existence of the which has been educating 1272 graduates of participants to do Community Development of strengthening rural people from 5 continents on planet earth. It shows that this small church has been doing a lot of great works in term of community development.
I am very happy that I got permission from ARI campus and Nishinasuno Church to learn about it during my summer individual project. I am grateful to have the opportunity to do this project, to meet and hear the stories directly from the offender's history.

Interview results and collecting information
Flash back of Nishinasuno church history is very interesting to learn. I want to divide it into several periods that show what happened in the history of Nishinasuno Church and ARI in that each periods.
Pre establishment of Nishinasuno Church (1873 - 1893)
I met 3 resources person are: Mr. Hajime Kikuchi, Mr. Hyuya Tamura and Mr. Kazuho Makino during July 26-28th.
1.         Mr. Kikuchi is the second generation in the history of Nishinasuno Church and establishment ARI actors directly.
2.         Mr. Hyuya Tamura in his youth had been doing many activities with Rev. Haruo Fukumoto (Nishinasuno Church founder and the first pastor of the church) who also played a major role in the establishment of ARI. Mr. Hyuya Tamura also have a thorough knowledge of the history of the Nasu Canal which is little bit related to this article.
3.         Mr. Kazuho Makino is the next generation who still follow the history Nishinasuno and ARI until this day.
This is the story......
After the construction of the Nasu Canal by Innami and Yaita this area became fertile. Many newcomers from outside prefecture who eventually settled here, one of them is Mr. Tajima from Gunma Prefecture who came to Nishinasuno / Nasunogahara with his extended family at 1873. Gunma-ken is famous of silk worms cultivation. Tajima brought his knowledge from Gunma to Nishinasuno about how to manage the silkworm to one marketed to Yokohama. In Yokohama Tajima met a Christian Missionary and he became a Christian. It is not known whether the previous Tajima is Sintoism or other religion. Then the history of Christianity in Nishinasuno/Nasunogahara is began enter this place.
Nishinasuno community which is consisting of farmers and imigrant has characteristics that are open minded and receptive to new ideas. Tajima organize silkworm farmers in Nishinasuno. That is why nowadays we encounter many of the mulberry tree in surround ARI field. Tajima also formed a farmer cooperative that time. Tajima show a good leader, so that many farmers followed his footsteps become Christian. Many times meetings was held in the framework of the organization of silkworm farming activities and worship by him. Church as communion has been formed but have not had a special place of worship. They call it Christian Meeting, not a church. Tajima leadership is really rooted in the community together in a fairly long period of time. Be told that Tajima also foster communication and excellent relations with Buddhist and Shinto communities around Nishinasuno.

Nishinasuno Church Establishment
The history jumps in the presence of Rev. Haruo Fukumoto from Tokyo to Nishinasuno. The foundations of a strong Christian community has been built long ago by Tajima in his day. Haruo Fukumoto is the next Christian leaders in the community sequel.
Fukumoto is a graduate of South East Asian Course (SEAC) 1960-1972) of Christian Rural Leader's Training by Evangelical Theological Rural Seminary in Tsurukawa Tokyo. Rev. Fukumoto later founded the church Nishinasuno on September 16th 1893 under the denomination of Methodist Church. Several other churches are also growing simultaneously as the development of Christianity in Japan that began at 3 centers : Yokohama, Kobe and Hokaiddo. The three centers had a same Japanese way of Christianity, that is implemented in a pluralistic condition.
In the Second World War the Japanese government applied the rule should not be any denomination, so all the Protestant churches in Japan became one unity so that easily to be controlled. Nishinasuno joined in UCCJ (United Christian Church of Japan) or Kyodan. That is why Kyodan homestay program for participants is a part of learning and effort for future relations with ARI history can be understood by participants.

History of the ARI, Tochigi (1960-1973)
History jumps back to the founding of ARI. As the material history by Otsu Sensei, before named ARI is now, it was once named SEAC in Tsurukawa (1961-1972). Rev Fukumoto one of the students in SEAC who attended various rural leadership training programs in several Asian countries. Fukumoto met Dr. Toshihiro Takami in Tokyo.
In the summer season, SEAC partisipants visited for survey to Nishinasuno Church congregation in farming community and their farming practices.
Having made ​​several observations about the condition of Nishinasuno, SEAC program moved from Tsurukawa to Nasunogahara / Nishinasuno in 1973 and renamed to be Asian Rural Institute whose program is the Asian Rural Leader Training. According to the Kikuchi Sensei telling, the reason why chose this place is because it is not too far from Tokyo (easy to access) but it is still village condition, fertile land (because of Nasu Canal building) and open-minded society.
Rev. Fukumoto fully supports the establishment of ARI in Nishinasuno. Due to a variety of support and has maintained an intimate relationship between SEAC and Nishinasuno Church for more than 10 years.
Therefore, the location of the new site ARI training program was decided in Nishinasuno in 1973 by Dr. Takami Sensei. Rev.Fukumoto is a key person who continue strong leadership character as one of the skills that must be owned by a community leader. Rev. Fukumoto became the first pastor in Nishinasuno Kyookai (1956-1991)
As Tajima did, Rev. Fukumoto also maintained a good relationship with the Budhist Monk and Shintoism people. In addition, he also developed a good relationship with some of the entrepreneurs in Nishinasuno, Major of Nishinasuno and banks, one of those is Asikaga Bank (because of always maintained a good relationship for decades, so this day Asikaga Bank became one of the supporters of the program at ARI).

Year 2004-until now
A little jump in 2004 the government Tochigi combine 3 locations: Nishinasuno, Kuroiso Nikko and Shiobara into a city. In that time the population of the three regions around 25,000 people but now increased to around 100,000 people. Like a ship, across the sea Nishinasuno Church Community Development continues with ARI. Establish a long history of this small church to be strong to face the challenges of the world.
From the participants stories about the activities of Community Development in their respective countries on ARI Sunday, Nishinasuno Church members can follow the movement of Community Development. Then the congregation is also involved in several activities in ARI. In the process of continuous interaction and mutual support that's Theology of Empowerment truly uniquely applied in this church.
Valuable lessons that can be taken

1.    Rev. Fukumoto and Tajima have the same way of thinking and a strong Christian leadership character is also applied in organizing farmers and farmer cooperatives. Leadership skill and knowledge was developed and became the core training program at ARI.
2.    The leader is always be a pioneer of changing. Tajima pioneered Christianity in Nishinasuno. He was a brave and willing to work hard and thus provide a good example, then he is respected and members followed his step even passed on to the next generation. Fukumoto also a respected leader figure, because not only is willing to continue the positive steps of Fukumoto predecessor but Fukumoto also made bold steps in establishing Nishinasuno Church. Then Fukumoto together with Dr. Takami Sensei are the main thinker of ARI establishment. Dr. Takami developed servant leadership on learning in the next ARI. The coordination is very good and effectively by leaders. Leadership style may be different but they have the same goal in Community Development.
3.    Maintaining a good relationship with many parties is one of the strategies that must be mastered by a leader if she/he wants to do sustainability of Community Development.
4.    Leadership in Community Development was already started since before the establishment of the  Nishinasuno Church that makes this church is very special in Japan.
The Conclusion:
Nishinasuno Church does not merely establish ARI, but the presence of ARI in Nishinasuno could not separated from the role of Nishinasuno Church. In its development until now, training in ARI activity was also strongly related to the activity of Nishinasuno Church. Both of these institutions are not belong to each other formally, but the philosophy underlying the establishment of these two institutions are the same, that is Community Development.

Benefits of Community Development concept by Nishinasuno Church and ARI
The life of faith in Christ is not only shown in the weekly praying and worship in the church but the real action for the defense of the weak and marginalized people is a part of praying. This small church is an example of how to practice the teachings of Jesus Christ's love. In his day Jesus was speaking the truth and defended the poor and oppressed by the peace movement, the anti-violent but very effective and clear result, that is a change. Changes that we feel right now, but follow-up is the responsibility of the followers of Christ and must be performed continuously.
Until today injustice is still happens in various forms all over the planet. In the name of development, the rural poor are often sacrificed. In the name of modernization and of some interest groups who have the power, people often ignore weak groups especially in rural areas. Yet they have great potential to act as subjects, not as objects of development.
Just as Jesus did, this village addressed church leaders in the world regardless of religious, ethnic and political backgrounds to serve rural communities in their countries. True Christianity realizes itself in plurality and this is truly appreciated by this small church.

Recommendations
Recommendations for Nishinasuno Church are:
1. This small research is only a first step which is very shallow. I wish there was a development of ideas or a more in-depth study of the history of this church by many historians, church members or society at large. Can be a study of the literature and interviews or more complete researches.
2. Community Development topic in the church would be able to bring up other topics that realistically happening in many churches
3. Nishinasuno should begin to prepare new leaders who continue Community Development as Jesus Christ did.
4. Other recommendations can be added by anyone who is involved in the community development church

Recommendation for ARI are :
1.        ARI is still remain as a tool of the church in serving the community in diversity and plurality as a part of church itself.
2.        ARI continues to educate the village leaders based on Christian Leadership, educating them to be able to capture the global issues of concern, then pass on to farmers and rural communities in accordance with their understanding then act locally with their idea and potency.
3.        Servant leadership will continue show and apply clearly into the whole learning.

Village is a potential area to be developed in the future. ARI had a lot of good resources : staffs, nature, partner or other support resources. I have a feeling blessed became ARI student and involved in Organic agriculture life, Community Development, Rural Development Strategy with Christianity spirit. As a graduate I will continue this learning in my rural community back home. As a leader I will follow ARI style of leadership, servant leadership for community development.


Sabtu, 19 April 2014

Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas



But the whole crowd shouted " Kill Jesus ! , Give us Barabbas !"
(Luke 23: 18)

Real case in point:
In 2008, there is a farmer, in a village in the Kediri District. East Java Province, Indonesia, named Kuncoro  has created a variety of corn that he obtained through crossbreeding methods of parent seeds are sold by a big company.
The government regulation about it, called UUSBT (Undang-Undang Sistem Budidaya Tanaman) No. 12/1992 on Plant Cultivation System  of Indonesia which should protect the farmers it actually drove him (Kuncoro) to go to prison for 7 months, by the company accused in the judge.
The farmers are not allowed to develop any seed by themselves. The regulation also prohibits them sell seeds without a certificate. With this law, farmers are forced to buy seed corn from the manufacturer,only.
Actually, hereditary habits conducted by the farmers are all held by the farmers themselves. They have seeds collection in each region. But because of this regulation, shall obtain all permits and certification. Yet to obtain permits and certification is not easy because it can only be met by companies that have much money.
Although this time Kuncoro has been released from prison and the regulation about it in Indonesia has been revised, there is already no prohibition for anyone to do his creativity producing any crop varieties, but the injustice was already sacrificed an innocent person, including his family, because nobody care how about his family life during he was in the prison. The similar cases also happens a lot in many places. That is what I think of when I say "Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas".

"Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas" contains a message that many law applies in this world upside down. It is not a court , but the law of the judgement powered  by unfair player that work together with government. The poor people in the third world, the farmers who grow the food that was supposed to be the rulers of the food, they has always been "crucified ", become victim of oppression, victim of discrimination by the tyrants.
“Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas, apparently it does not only happen when the crucifixion of Jesus. It is happening in the world today also.

Why was Jesus crucified?
Since when Jesus prayed in Getsemane, he already alone, lonely and afraid. No friend, even though only one hour, no friend was with him. When Jesus in front of the judge, no lawyer. No justice. That’s what Jesus would be shown.
Jesus was crucified for telling us that we often have to carry the cross in our lives alone.
No friends around us. Maybe there are friends accompany us, but we must face the cross by ourselves. We can not move our cross to others. Each of us has their own cross. Does the condition fair? Sometimes not it all. But, God forms us to be stronger through the cross that we are carrying.

There are many "Jesus"s today who are forced to undergo punishment for something when nothing was ever done that was wrong. Many of the " Barabbas "s today's that defense so instead he gets to enjoy the benefits in the form of comfort, freedom ,wealth, good name at the expense of the poor and weak parties.
Jesus put himself into the image of the poor and weak people.

With the crucifixion, does it mean that Jesus lost the legal world that is upside down ? Absolutely no. Jesus is not loser. He was the winner of the war against injustice. The victory of Jesus was realized when we (Jesus followers)  understand how to act when seeing injustices that oppress the poor and marginalized people.

So the irony is that the whole crowd shouted "Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas " and this contains a message for us to always be ready and be sensitive to injustice in the world, because it seems that injustice has happened, is happening and will continue to happen.

It is a challenge for us as followers of Christ to apply his courage to break the order and conditions of injustice wherever we are, this we do together with communities we accompany.

Lifeis not measured bygreat material wealth, money, other property pursued by any means, politics that gain money and power in oppression. But it is measured by our alignment with the victims of injustice, the underdog and seemingly defeated for this will show who we really are, that those who have confessed to be a follower of Christ.

Jesus was crucified because he never be bought by money and by any power no matter what courage against injustice was done by peaceful ways, non-violent . Even though he acted in a peaceful way, still he raised protest until he was vilified, judged even though not proven guilty ), tortured and killed in the most cruel way like a great villain. While Barabbas, the great villain was released because the public, the crowd shouted.

Jesus is our role model in managing the community . Jesus was very inspiring . But in the world of today's ironical crowd shouted “Kill Jesus, Give us Barabbas” it still seems that Killing Jesus and Giving Barabbas” continues to happen...


by
Eunike Brahmantyo
at reflection about Crucifixion of Jesus 
ARI 2014




Jumat, 07 Februari 2014

Kebahagiaan


-->
Kehidupan ini memang tak menjanjikan selalu bahagia kalau kita mencetak kebahagiaan itu menurut ukuran kita sendiri.
Pilihan-pilihan dalam hidup kita dituntun oleh kata hati dan suara hati.

Karena kebahagiaan itu sendiri sering kita posisikan jauh dari kita terlebih dahulu, sehingga kita pun memposisikan diri, mengambil ancang-ancang untuk berlari mengejarnya. Padahal apa sih kebahagiaan itu, kalau ternyata sudah ada di dekat kita, Cuma kita sendiri yang mengingkari itu dengan menganggap ah, itu sih biasa saja, bukan hal istimewa.
Kebahagiaan adalah ketika kita merdeka untuk mengambil keputusan.

My complicated feeling



Galauku... 

Berdesir hatiku
Memandangi wajah polos si kecil tertidur lelap
Juga galau ketika kakaknya menangis di suatu malam sambil memelukku
Hampir terhanyut di tangisnya, namun kutegarkan hati agar tak tampak di matanya
Buah hatiku yang sebentar lagi (sebenarnya masih satu setengah bulan lagi) kutinggalkan

Masa-masa sulit akan kita lalui…
Berat? Itu pasti
Sedih? Wajar karena tidak akan bertemu selama 9 bulan…
Berbagai kekhawatiran mulai menyerangku kini
Bagaimana si besar belajarnya tiap hari, apalagi kalau mau ulangan.
Ingat setiap belajar matematika dia dibentak-bentak bapaknya
Bagaimana kalau si kecil rewel, ….atau susunya habis,…popoknya habis, atau dia menjadi sedih mencari ibunya tiba-tiba menghilang.
Ya…aku akan melewatkan beberapa tahap pertumbuhannya…
Saat ini dia mulai pandai berjalan…
Mungkin aku harus tak menyaksikan dia mulai berlari untuk pertama kalinya…
Aku harus tak menyaksikan celotehnya berkata-kata lucu…

Di ujung malam…Kudekap kekasihku, menitipkan pesan rindu dan segala urusan untuk bekal sepeninggalku nanti
Sebagai ganti trenyuh hatiku yang tak mampu lagi kusampaikan dengan kata-kata…


Eunike Brahmantyo
special for Daudy Brahmantyo

Selasa, 07 Januari 2014

MOTHER EARTH IS NUTRITIOUS SOURCE


The development potential of local food is the foundation for the realization of food sovereignty and food security.The food crisis has been happening not because of the issue of the availability of stock or natural conditions in upland rice harvest only once a year. Rice yields in rainfed land only once a year, but farmers in the village are generally still have tubers and other food sources of nutrition. The main problem is precisely the omission of the invasion of imported products that marginalize the position of farmers. Farmers as food authorities actually be changed the status became dependent beneficiary (RASKIN/rice for poor) that subsidized rice imports. Expanse of ocean surrounding the Nusantara/Indonesia archipelago bestow much salt but government not strengthen farmers to increase salt production but chose an easy way to import salt form outside. Farmers fighting for sovereignty, many empowerment programs that raise the potential of local food and farmers, but at the same time strengthening food products imported faucets open widely. It becomes a paradox which shows that the government is not pro- independence for farmers clearly, and tend to roll out the red carpet on the globalization of food. " Mother Earth is Nutritious Food Source " dated December  Desember 30-31st 2013 in a series of Assorted Festival of Food , Energy and Cultural Foundation led by Trukajaya with Lembu Village Youth group Semarang District. Suwarto Adi, Executive Director of Trukajaya convey that food insecurity experienced Lembu village for 2 years in the dry season and encourages all parties concerned to make a real effort to strengthen the potential for future food .There are many of programs and action plans that will be supported by the Government (Office of Food Security) and the relevant government agencies through various forms of campaigns, competitions and mentoring Farmers, Women Farmers Group and Youth Farmer in the development of local food products and food storage.Farmers must restore their confidence as ruler of food and food heroes for the realization of national food security   We need supports of all parties to realize the sovereignty and independence of farmers to food .Margo Purwanto, Chairman of the Lembu Rural Youth Group said that the festival circuit is the meeting place of the parties in the Lembu village development frame. In it there are 9 races that are all loaded elements of education about food, energy and local culture that involves all elements of the Lembu villagers started pre-school children, adolescents, youth and the elderly. In addition to seminars and competitions, cultural performances are also held in the form of dance which campaigns tribute to farmers and respect to the motherland. Activity in 2013 is closing about 300 residents enthusiastically invites both participants, resource persons, the race jury, Semarang district government representatives, representatives of the villages in the Bancak District, FISKOM Satya Wacana CHristian University , Lembu village government, arta players, race participants and spectators.



BUMI PERTIWI SUMBER PANGAN BERGIZI
Pengembangan potensi pangan lokal merupakan fondasi untuk terwujudnya kedaulatan pangan dan ketahanan pangan.
Krisis pangan selama ini terjadi bukan karena persoalan ketersediaan stok ataupun kondisi alam di lahan kering yang panen padi hanya sekali dalam setahun. Panen padi di lahan tadah hujan hanya sekali dalam setahun, tetapi petani di desa umumnya masih punya umbi-umbian dan bahan pangan lain sumber gizi. Persoalan utama justru pada pembiaran terhadap serbuan produk impor yang meminggirkan posisi petani. Petani sebagai penguasa pangan justru diubah statusnya menjadi penerima bantuan RASKIN yang tergantung beras impor.  Bentangan lautan mengelilingi Nusantara melimpahkan sumber garam namun pemerintah bukan memperkuat petani garam untuk meningkatkan produksi tetapi memilih jalan mudah mengimpor garam. Kedaulatan petani diperjuangkan, banyak program pemberdayaan yang mengangkat potensi  pangan lokal dan penguatan petani namun sekaligus kran impor produk pangan dibuka lebar-lebar. Ini menjadi paradox yang menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah tidak cukup berpihak pada kemandirian petani bahkan cenderung menggelar karpet merah pada  arus globalisasi pangan. Seminar bertema “Bumi Pertiwi Sumber Pangan Bergizi” tanggal 30-31 Desember 2013 dalam rangkaian Festival Aneka Pangan, Energy dan Budaya yang dimotori oleh Yayasan Trukajaya bersama Karang Taruna Desa Lembu Kec. Bancak Kab. Semarang yang digelar selama 2 hari. Suwarto Adi, Direktur Pelaksana Trukajaya menyampaikan bahwa kerawanan pangan yang dialami desa lembu selama 2 tahun di musim kemarau yang lalu menggugah semua pihak terkait untuk melakukan upaya nyata memperkuat potensi pangan ke depan.
Sementara itu Sri Windiyani, Kasi Ketersediaan dan Kerawanan Pangan Kantor Ketahanan Pangan Kabupaten Semarang memaparkan bahwa banyak program dan rencana aksi yang akan didukung oleh Kantor Ketahanan Pangan dan badan pemerintah terkait melalui berbagai bentuk kampanye, lomba-lomba maupun pendampingan Petani, Kelompok Wanita Tani dan Pemuda Tani  dalam pengembangan produk pangan lokal dan lumbung pangan.
Petani harus mengembalikan kepercayaan dirinya sebagai penguasa pangan dan pahlawan pangan  untuk terwujudnya ketahanan pangan nasional. Perlu dukungan semua pihak untuk mewujudkan kedaulatan dan kemandirian petani atas pangan.
Margo Purwanto, Ketua Karang Taruna Desa Lembu menyampaikan bahwa rangkaian festival ini merupakan ajang pertemuan para pihak dalam satu bingkai pengembangan desa Lembu. Di dalamnya ada 9 lomba yang semuanya sarat unsure pendidikan tentang pangan, energy dan budaya lokal yang melibatkan semua unsur masyarakat desa Lembu mulai anak usia pra sekolah, remaja, pemuda dan orang tua. Selain seminar dan lomba, diadakan pula pentas budaya berupa tari-tarian yang mengkampanyekan penghormatan kepada petani dan ibu pertiwi. Kegiatan menutup tahun 2013 ini mengundang antusias sekitar 300 warga baik peserta seminar, nara sumber, juri lomba, perwakilan pemerintah kabupaten semarang, perwakilan desa-desa di Kecamatan Bancak, FISKOM UKSW, pemerintah desa Lembu, pemain kesenian, peserta lomba dan para penonton.

Ditulis oleh: Eunike Brahmantyo